|
|
Peer Reviewing
- The manuscript submitted to the editors is subjected to formal editorial requirements. If the paper doesn’t comply with the requirements of the journal it excludes from further consideration.
- If the papers comply with requirements they are submitted for evaluation to independent experts.
- Reviewing is undergone on the basis of two-sided anonymous expert: author is not known to reviewers and the reviewers are not known to the author.
- The editors reserve the right to reject the manuscript without sending it for review.
- Reviewers are notified that manuscripts are the private property of the authors and relate to information not subject to disclosure.
- The reviewer makes the decision about the probability of publishing article, about the probability of publishing article after revision, or appropriateness for publication.
- Anonymous reviews are sent to the author.
- If the author disagrees with the opinion of the reviewer, she has the right to appeal to the editor.
- Revised article is sent for re-review.
- The final decision on the publication of the paper is adopted at the meeting of the editorial board and may not reflect the recommendations of the reviewers.
- If necessary, the manuscript may be sent for re-review.
This procedure review may not apply to invited papers and articles on the theme-based issue of a magazine.
|
|
|